Submit a Story!

"The Filthy Fifteen" States With Most Dangerous Coal Ash

 
In the wake of the December 22 disastrous spill of toxic coal ash into a Tennessee River -- into and over houses, leaving sludge behind that the Tennessee Valley Authority simultaneously said wasn't dangerous and that should be avoided at all costs, we wondered where else we should be worried about coal ash sitting around, waiting to be dumped on neighbors. The Natural Resource Defense Council is thinking further ahead, coming up with a state-by-state threat report, based on where new coal plants and coal ash storage is planned . It features what they call "The Filthy Fifteen:" 1. Texas 2. South Dakota 3. Florida 4. Nevada 5. Montana 6. Illinois 7. South Carolina 8. Ohio 9. Wyoming 10. Michigan 11. Kentucky 12. Missouri 13. Wisconsin 14. Georgia 15. West Virginia See all of the stats and details for these states and more at the NRDC's site . As they put it: More than 80 new coal-fired power plants have been proposed around the country. If built, the plants would produce 18 ... (link)

Tags:

Related Content
Building the Low-Emissions Future
energyoutlook.blogspot.com 3/16/2009 — Last week The Economist published a detailed assessment of the state play for capturing and storing the carbon dioxide emitted by power plants and factories. Although it skirted the assertion of many environmentalists that "clean coal" is inherently ...
Storing Sunlight
energyoutlook.blogspot.com 3/16/2009 — An article in MIT's Technology Review on a new liquid battery technology got me re-thinking an assumption I've been making for some time concerning the synergy between renewable energy and better batteries. The article's author makes a similar ...
New flavors of chutzpah
theenergycollective.com 3/16/2009 — For those who haven’t heard it, the classic definition of chutzpah is a child who murders his parents and then asks a judge for mercy because he’s an orphan. While nothing below or in the recent news reaches quite that mythical height (with the possible exception of the rampant idiocy over at ...
ATTN Matthew Wald at the NY Times: Does This Look Like "Environment-Friendly" Coal to You?!
watthead.blogspot.com 3/17/2009 — Writing today for the New York Times, Matthew Wald looks at the increased prospects for new coal plants that capture and store their CO2, due to investments in CCS demonstration plants included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act . Writing about Duke Energy's plans to build a new coal ...
Stimulus Money Puts Clean Coal Projects on a Faster Track
nytimes.com 3/17/2009 — The federal stimulus bill has allocated $3.4 billion for clean coal technologies, and companies are lining up with projects. >
US government slammed over coal projectThe most recent articles from BusinessGreen 3/13/2009
Danny Bradbury, BusinessGreen , Friday 13 March 2009 at 00:15:00 Basic accounting error led government department to miscalculate ongoing project costs The Department of Energy (DoE) acted irresponsibly in withdrawing support for a ...
Bill Chameides: How Much Coal Is Really in Them Thar Hills?Green on HuffingtonPost.com 3/17/2009
Dr. Bill Chameides is the dean of Duke University's Nicholas School of the Environment and a member of the National Academy of Sciences. He blogs regularly at theGreenGrok.com . They used to say that "coal is king." Today maybe it's "'clean ...