Submit a Story!
EPA: Waxman-Markey Will Lower Electricity Bills
Our guest blogger is Daniel J. Weiss, a Senior Fellow and the Director of Climate Strategy at the Center for American Progress Action Fund. The main argument conservatives and big oil and coal companies use against the American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454) is that it would cripple ...
Fact Sheet: Coal Combustion Residues (CCR) - Surface Impoundments with High Hazard Potential ...
epa.gov — EPA530-F-09-006 June 2009 Over the past several months, EPA has undertaken a concerted effort to identify and... to assess the structural integrity of impoundments, dams, or other management units, within the electric power generating industry, holding ... (more) Fact Sheet: Coal Combustion Residues (CCR) - Surface ...
Bubkes
realclimate.org — Some parts of the blogosphere, headed up by CEI (" CO2: They call it pollution, we call... it life! "), are all a-twitter over an apparently "suppressed" document that supposedly undermines the EPA Endangerment finding about human emissions of carbon ... (more) Bubkes
Economic Analyses | Climate Change - Climate Economics | U.S. EPA
epa.gov — Download EPA memo, ' Ways in Which Revisions to the American Clean Energy and Security Act Change... the Projected Economic Impacts of the Bill ' (PDF) (2 pp, 21KB, About PDF ) Download the Executive Summary: Executive Summary (PDF) (9 pp, 79 KB, About ... (more) Economic Analyses | Climate Change - Climate Economics | ...
Comments
Blog Reactions

New EPA analysis of Waxman-Markey: Consumer electric bills 7% lower in 2020 thanks to efficiency — plus 50 GW of extra coal retirements and no new dirty plants
The Energy Collective — The EPA has posted its detailed analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454) here.  The bottom line is that the total cost to consumers is low, just as CBO found — just as all major independent analyses of even strong action show (see “”Intro to climate economics“).  You can read the House Energy and Commerce summary of the EPA analysis here.  In this post from Wonk Room, guest blogger, Daniel J. Weiss, Director of Climate Strategy at the Center for American Progress Action ...

ABC-WP Poll: Clear majority of Americans approve of Obama’s handling of global warming and support greenhouse gas regulation even if raises their energy bills — even if China and India do less
Climate Progress — ... The poll asked respondents if they would be willing to pay an extra $10 a month in higher electricity bills to reduce greenhouse gas pollution. There were willing to do so by a net of 14 percent. This could be purely hypothetical.  EPA’s analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act estimates the bill’s energy efficiency provisions would lower utility bills by 7% or an average of $7 per month. ...

New EPA Analysis of Waxman-Markey: Consumer Electric Bills 7% Lower in 2020 Thanks To Efficiency
Worldchanging: Bright Green — electricmeter.png The EPA has posted its detailed analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454) here . The bottom line is that the total cost to consumers is low, just as CBO found — just as all major independent analyses of even strong action show (see “” Intro to climate economics “). You can read the House Energy and Commerce summary of the EPA analysis here . In this post from Wonk Room , guest blogger, Daniel J. Weiss , Director of Climate Strategy at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, discusses the ...

GOP team at American Energy Alliance runs ‘Energy Town Hall’ oil bus tour
Grist - the Latest from Grist — ... The American Energy Alliance (AEA), a new polluter front group, is touring the nation to smear President Barack Obama’s clean energy reform agenda. Employees riding the “American Energy Express” bus are spreading the conservative lies that the American Clean Energy and Security Act will “ ...

CBS’s Declan McCullagh promotes another fossil-fuel-funded, falsehood-filled CEI attack on clean energy reform
Climate Progress — ... The American Clean Energy and Security Act Builds A Clean Economy For A Postage Stamp A Day. The EPA estimates a net cost of about $100 per household per year, which would be fully offset for lower-income consumers. The Congressional Budget Office — which did not consider the energy efficiency measures or the cost of inaction — determined “that the net annual economywide cost of the cap-and-trade program in 2020 would be $22 billion—or about ...

CBS’s Declan McCullagh promotes another false CEI attack on clean energy reform
Grist - the Latest from Grist — ... The American Clean Energy and Security Act Builds A Clean Economy For A Postage Stamp A Day.  The EPA estimates a net cost of about $100 per household per year, which would be fully offset for lower-income consumers. The Congressional Budget Office—which did not consider the energy efficiency measures or the cost of inaction—determined “that the net annual economywide cost of the cap-and-trade program in 2020 would be $22 billion—or about ...

Related Content
New EPA analysis of Waxman-Markey: Consumer electric bills 7% lower in 2020 thanks to efficiency — plus 50 GW of extra coal retirements and no new dirty plants
climateprogress.org 6/25/2009 — The EPA has posted its detailed analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454) here . The bottom line is that the total cost to consumers is low, just as CBO found — just as all major independent analyses of even strong ...
New EPA analysis of Waxman-Markey: Consumer electric bills 7% lower in 2020 thanks to efficiency — plus 50 GW of extra coal retirements and no new dirty plants
theenergycollective.com 6/25/2009 — The EPA has posted its detailed analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454) here .  The bottom line is that the total cost to consumers is low, just as CBO found — just as all major independent analyses of even strong action show (see “” Intro to climate economics ...
EPA Analysis Projects Waxman-Markey Would Not Require Any Emissions Reductions Through 2020
theenergycollective.com 6/18/2009 — Originally posted at the Breakthrough Institute The Waxman-Markey climate bill (HR 2454) will not require emissions reductions below projected business as usual (BAU) growth in emissions for at least a decade ahead, according to an EPA analysis [pdf] . EPA projects that firms covered under the ...
A useful summary of Waxman-Markey
climateprogress.org 6/15/2009 — The Energy and Commerce Committee finally released a summary ( here ) of the American Clean Energy and Security Act as reported by the Committee on May 21 by a vote of 33 to 25. Here are the key provisions: Require electric utilities to meet 20% ...
Everything you always wanted to know about EPA greenhouse gas regulations, but were afraid to ask
grist.org 9/24/2009 — by David Roberts Two years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the EPA has the authority and the obligation to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. At a stroke, the politics of climate change were changed. The choice was no longer ...
Ethanol-Gasoline Fuel Blends May Cause Human Health Risks and Engine Issues
ewg.org 5/18/2009 — May 18th, 2009 In March 2009 corn ethanol producers asked for help from the federal government to expand their industry. Growth Energy, a consortium of ethanol producers, petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to allow ...
Carbon emissions pose danger, EPA finds
features.csmonitor.com 4/17/2009 — In deciding that carbon dioxide poses a danger to human health and the environment, the Environmental Protection Agency has laid the groundwork for new and expansive federal oversight of carmakers, utilities, and a host of other large emitters of the ...
Climate Bill Analysis Part 16: EPA Projects Fewer Renewables Under Waxman Markey than Business As Usual
thebreakthrough.org 6/25/2009 — The Waxman-Markey climate bill (AKA the American Clean Energy and Security Act) would reduce the amount of renewable energy deployed in the United States relative to business-as-usual, increase the amount of coal-fired electricity generation relative ...
The EPA finds greenhouse gases to be dangerous, but what does that mean?
theenergycollective.com 3/28/2009 — EPA logo In a landmark move , the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is about to declare an “endangerment finding” on GHGs, meaning they officially acknowledge them to be a threat to human health, and are therefore required to regulate them under the Clean Air Act (CAA). This is ...
Can EPA regulations on CO2 be blocked?
grist.org 23 days ago — by David Roberts It’s widely assumed that if Congress fails to pass a clean energy bill, the EPA will step in with regulations on CO2 under the Clean Air Act . The Supreme Court ruled in 2007’s Mass. v EPA that it must do so if it finds ...
How Much Will The Climate Bill Cost You?Green on HuffingtonPost.com 6/23/2009
A nonpartisan congressional study projects only modest household cost increases as a result of a Democratic proposal to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, contradicting claims by many Republican lawmakers that the climate legislation ...
Getting to the Core of TwistersScientific American - Environment 6/23/2009
[Please note: this is a special episode of Earth, and runs longer than the usual length. Below is the original script. But a few changes may have been made during the recording of this audio podcast.] Mother nature is known for her irony.  And ...
T. Boone Pickens: Propane and the Pickens PlanGreen on HuffingtonPost.com 6/23/2009
Official Washington has been in vigorous discussions - internally and externally - about alternative fuels and their role in our energy portfolio today and in the future. We are talking about solar, wind, geo-thermal and bio-methane. We are ...
600 U.S. Neighborhoods Have Air That Could Cause CancerGreen on HuffingtonPost.com 6/24/2009
WASHINGTON — Millions of people living in nearly 600 neighborhoods across the country are breathing concentrations of toxic air pollutants that put them at a much greater risk of contracting cancer, according to new data from the Environmental ...
House Majority Leader Predicts Climate Bill Will PassGreen on HuffingtonPost.com 6/26/2009
Democratic House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer predicted Friday that his party would have the 218 votes needed to ensure passage of historic legislation to battle global warming.