Blog Reactions
FUTURISM NOW: Climate Map Shows World after 4C Rise
Strategies for Sustainability: Prove It
The Guardian | Environment : Clive James isn't a climate sceptic, he's a sucker
| RT @SusanneWhite: http://tinyurl.com/ykdxnwv We're being trounced by climate change deniers. 28 hours ago |
| @cleolinda Need a favor. Can you plug http://tinyurl.com/ykdxnwv? We're being trounced by climate change deniers and really need more /1 28 hours ago |
| 'Prove it!' http://j.mp/2bVJ96 http://yfrog.com/1ybkuj 29 hours ago |
Climate Map Shows World after 4C Rise
FUTURISM NOW —
Click on this map to go to the original map at the Guardian. The map, launched at the Science Museum in London has been developed using the latest peer-reviewed science from the Met Office Hadley Centre and other leading impact scientists. It shows that the land will heat up more quickly than the sea, and high latitudes, particularly the Arctic, will have larger temperature increases. The map shows the impact of an average 4C rise in global temperature, which John Beddington, the government’s chief scientist, said would be “disastrous”. A study by the ...
Prove It
Strategies for Sustainability —
... Check out this intense new info-graphic developed by the British Met Office, that is now on display in the London Science Museum: ...
Clive James isn't a climate sceptic, he's a sucker
The Guardian | Environment —
... shows that the number of internet pages proposing that man-made global warming is a hoax or a lie more than doubled last year. The Science Museum's Prove it! exhibition asks online readers to endorse or reject a statement that they've seen the evidence and want governments to take action. As of yesterday afternoon, 1,006 people had endorsed it and 6,110 had rejected it. On Amazon.co.uk, books championing climate change denial are currently ranked at 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 8 in the global warming category. Never mind that they've been torn to shreds ...
Death Denial
Permaculture Research Institute of Australia —
... growth of climate change denial over the past two years is actually a response to the hardening of scientific evidence? If so, how the hell do we confront it? With thanks to George Marshall References: http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/556.pdf http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment_energy/44_say_global_warming_due_to_planetary_trends_not_people http://www.desmogblog.com/2008-stats-global-warming-denial-blogosphere http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/proveit.aspx ...
